Archive for October, 2008

Apostrophe crime

Thursday, October 16th, 2008

They’re everywhere – these criminals with a wanton disregard for the rest of us, undermining standards, setting a bad example and generally ruining a once proud nation. How can we hold our heads up high, even in the knowledge that we finished above Australia in the Olympic medals table, or that we are going to stage the greatest sporting event on earth in 2012, while this sort of thing carries on?
It’s got to stop. We must join together and take a stand. We have to stamp out apostrophe crime.
It used to be known as the greengrocers’ apostrophe. You would see Apple’s  or Cabbage’s when it should be Apples or Cabbages. Nowadays this glaring error is not confined to greengrocers, oh no. We have the garages’ apostrophe, the supermarkets’ apostrophe, the practically any trader’s or company’s apostrophe.
The rules for apostrophes are clear and simple. They are used to denote missing letters, such as I mustn’t instead of I must not, or it’s instead of it is; they are used to denote possession, such as the Chamber’s policy or the writer’s pen or the directors’ meeting,
They are never, ever – not even in your wildest dreams – used to denote plurals. So we don’t have “MOT’s carried out here”, or “100’s of CD’s in stock”, or “Free magazine’s at reception”.
It is time for the great British public to rise up and demand that apostrophe criminals change their ways. Perhaps we could give them ASBOs (Apostrophe Standard Breaching Orders) or maybe give them 1000 lines (I must not misuse apostrophes for example by writing I must not misuse apostrophe’s) for every offence.
OK – so this is a bit of a rant, but there is a serious point here. We are always hearing about businesses bemoaning the inability of school leavers to cope with basic Maths or English. But who are employers to say such things when so many of them – and there are big companies which are in the apostrophe criminal classes – get such a simple rule of English wrong?
Now I am not against the English language evolving; it always has and always will. But we cannot throw grammar and spelling out of the window or down the drain just because we cannot be bothered to avoid mistakes.
So let’s name and shame the apostrophe criminals. Send your examples of apostrophe crime us at pr dogs and let’s (missing letter) get our readers’ (plural possessive) backing for this agency’s (single possessive) campaign!

Dear bankers…

Sunday, October 12th, 2008

I write this open letter to you all while reflecting on the many thousands (or probably millions) of letters that you all have sent to us individuals, businesses and organisations over the years.

In these letters you have castigated us for spending more than we actually have; you have chastised us for living beyond our means; you have criticised us for being unwise and over-ambitious; you have chided us for not being prudent.
And now what do we find? You have been far from prudent; you have been unwise and over ambitious; you have been spending more than you have, in other words living beyond your means.

So we now find ourselves in the position, somewhat reluctantly, of being shareholders as well as customers while we try to help you out of the mess you have created.

What is curious to many of us is how your views have see-sawed so quickly. From being people who would lend to anyone at a bus stop, you won’t even lend to each other. This attitude is making the global situation worse. You all knew you were all, quite frankly, dodgy players before. Now we all know you are, you are pretending to be careful. That just means that as well as having to bail youy out, we are taking the hit in terms of a credit squeeze.

I come now to executive pay and bonuses. We are often told that pay for top executives such as you has to be competitive. It seems to many of us that most of you are not competent to run a whelk stall. If you actions plunge us all into recession there will be plenty of top executives around with nothing to do, so we suggest you look at your positions very carefully. We do not expect to see bonuses until we have been repaid, and we look to your remuneration committees to do the decent thing and slash your remuneration. If you want to go elsewhere as a result – good riddance.

I do hope you take these comments to heart. I will finish in a way that I believe is appropriate in view of our new relationship.

Your remain, sirs, my humble and obedient servants,

PS I believe it is customary in your profession to charge a fee of around £40 for writing such a letter as this. I look forward to your payments.

PPS In view of your current financial positions you should not draw further on your accounts, so cash, please.